![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|||
|
Tax Credits and Incentives for Production Companies in New Jersey Taxpayer Victory in Wisconsin on "Custom Software" Sales/Use Tax Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Bond Exemption Tax Incentives for Small Businesses Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 2008 Tax Pocket Guide A Makeover for Uncertain Tax Positions Substantiating Charitable Contributions - The Rules Tighten Executive Tax Planning for Change of State Residence White Paper on FIN 48 Phone Tax Refunds Available — How to get yours! 2007 Tax Pocket Guide 2006 Tax Planning Guide Tax Legislation Bush Signs $146 Billion Tax Plan, Reiterates Intention to Seek Permanency New Jersey Legislation Enacted June 2004 The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 The Working Families Tax Relief Act of 2004 Maximizing Your Retirement Plan Summary of Current NJ Legislative Changes Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 New Jersey Business Tax Reform Act Tax Services for SEC Companies & Subsidiaries |
Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Bond Exemption
May 16, 2008 In a 7-2 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has decided against the Kentucky taxpayers and in the "Davis" case relating to the state tax treatment of interest income from state and local obligations. The Supreme Court found that the practice of exempting municipal bonds issued by jurisdictions within the “home state” only, while taxing municipal bond interest of other states, does not discriminate unconstitutionally in favor of "home state" bonds and securities. As a result, states can continue imposing income tax on interest from obligations of other states and their local units of government while fully or partially exempting their own. The holding was widely anticipated in view of the large, adverse fiscal impact on many states and possibly, on national financial markets; and, particularly given the recent disturbance in these markets on account of the mortgage foreclosure crisis. For the most part, the decision means that "Davis" refund claims that have been prepare for New York State, California, New Jersey and other states, will be rejected by tax authorities. In the $2.5 trillion municipal bond market, 42 states exempt some or all interest on their bonds from income taxes, while taxing interest on bonds from other states. The states have said that throwing out the system of exemptions that began some 90 years ago would have a devastating impact on state finances.~ Amper, Politziner & Mattia, State and Local Tax Group |
Contact Us Locations & Directions Site map Amper, Politziner & Mattia, LLP • 1-866-99-AMPER • info@amper.com |
| web site design and online marketing solutions by Set Now Solutions, LLC |