Amper's tax services cover tax analysis with tax planning by our tax services and audit specialists.

Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Bond Exemption

• U.S. Supreme Court decided against Kentucky taxpayers

• exempting muni bonds issued by jurisdictions within the home state while taxing muni interest in other states does not discriminate unconstitutionally

• States can impose tax on interest from other states while exempting their own

• Decision was anticipated because of fiscal tax impact on many states and possibly national financial markets

• 42 states exempt some/all interest on bonds from income taxes, while taxing interest on bonds from other states


 Tax Articles

Tax Credits and Incentives for Production Companies in New Jersey

Taxpayer Victory in Wisconsin on "Custom Software" Sales/Use Tax

Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Bond Exemption

Tax Incentives for Small Businesses

Economic Stimulus Act of 2008

2008 Tax Pocket Guide

A Makeover for Uncertain Tax Positions

Substantiating Charitable Contributions - The Rules Tighten

Executive Tax Planning for Change of State Residence

White Paper on FIN 48

Phone Tax Refunds Available — How to get yours!

 Archives

2007 Tax Pocket Guide

2006 Tax Planning Guide

Tax Legislation Bush Signs $146 Billion Tax Plan, Reiterates Intention to Seek Permanency

New Jersey Legislation Enacted June 2004

The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004

The Working Families Tax Relief Act of 2004

Maximizing Your Retirement Plan

Summary of Current NJ Legislative Changes

Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003

New Jersey Business Tax Reform Act

Tax Services for SEC Companies & Subsidiaries

 Print this issue
Send your comments
Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Bond Exemption
May 16, 2008

In a 7-2 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has decided against the Kentucky taxpayers and in the "Davis" case relating to the state tax treatment of interest income from state and local obligations. The Supreme Court found that the practice of exempting municipal bonds issued by jurisdictions within the “home state” only, while taxing municipal bond interest of other states, does not discriminate unconstitutionally in favor of "home state" bonds and securities. 

As a result, states can continue imposing income tax on interest from obligations of other states and their local units of government while fully or partially exempting their own.

The holding was widely anticipated in view of the large, adverse fiscal impact on many states and possibly, on national financial markets; and, particularly given the recent disturbance in these markets on account of the mortgage foreclosure crisis.

For the most part, the decision means that "Davis" refund claims that have been prepare for New York State, California, New Jersey and other states, will be rejected by tax authorities. 

In the $2.5 trillion municipal bond market, 42 states exempt some or all interest on their bonds from income taxes, while taxing interest on bonds from other states.  The states have said that throwing out the system of exemptions that began some 90 years ago would have a devastating impact on state finances.

~ Amper, Politziner & Mattia, State and Local Tax Group


Contact Us
        Locations & Directions        Site map
Amper, Politziner & Mattia, LLP   •  1-866-99-AMPER  •  info@amper.com


web site design and online marketing solutions
by Set Now Solutions, LLC